dev_chieftain: (farron)
I've been involved with / following the stuff going on with the Feminist Frequency Kickstarter. Apparently the latest development is that, since the scare tactics aren't working, the persons who are angry about the project started their own fundraiser to try to one-up FemFreq. Their project is called "Misandry in Videogames", and they're very explicit that they won't need the money to make their webseries, it's 'all going to charity'. The comments are predictably full of obvious attempts to deride, defame, or undermine confidence in Sarkeesian and her project, both on the actual project page and in the comments from the backers.

Here's the thing. I think that, if this project were legitimate, it would be a worthy effort. If these people were looking to improve the interpretation of men in video games by critically analyzing the way that video game companies tell us that we perceive men in their sometimes crappy representations, I'd think this was a pretty good effort. The lack of depth of character and humanity is a serious problem with the entirety of pop-culture. It is no failing of Feminist Frequency that its focus is on addressing the problems in pop-culture representations of women. It would still be great if some other organization devoted to improving the rights of some other oppressed group wanted to do projects to raise awareness and inspire conversation about the problems in pop-culture representations of men.

The fact of the matter is this though: they don't really mean to make videos that are thoughtful critiques, and it shows. They're angry, they have decided for whatever reason that Sarkeesian is false and plans to blow the money she's made on something unrelated to the project she's doing. They don't care about the reality of the situation, they don't care about whether or not they're proving her right-- that there is a problem with sexism in interpersonal relations-- every time they comment in to tell her how much they hate her in their variety of colorful ways that I have no desire to quote here.

What really sucks is actually the backlash to the backlash. The definition of peaceful protest is that it must remain PEACEFUL. If we were putting ourselves in danger to achieve peaceful protest, it would require our maintained innocence-- carrying no weapons, refusing to stoop to the violence that our enemies were waging upon us, willingly making examples of ourselves if necessary to get the message across that this problem is big, and real, and must be fixed.

In the online world, the way to maintain innocence is never to actually insult-- not even through backhanded insults-- and regrettably, Sarkeesian failed to do this from day one by calling the response 'trolls'. It's not her fault, because that is the term we apply to generalized internet harassment ('I'm being trolled'). But the word still festers and rots in the hearts of those who are called it, especially those who, for whatever reason, didn't realize that they WERE trolling, and seriously thought that Sarkeesian was demanding privilege, instead of requesting equality.

I'm not saying these guys are right to be doing such assholish stuff to anyone, ever, and I'm certainly not saying that Sarkeesian is in the wrong. However, to respond to these people by dehumanizing them, referring to them as trolls, or babies, or whiners, or otherwise making mass generalizations about them, is not even REMOTELY helpful. Trolling the trolls back is just fucked up. That is bullying the bully. And you know what? That makes you one of the people in the crowd who's pointing and laughing and doing nothing to solve the problem.

Sarkeesian here is the true victim. She didn't do anything wrong, and she's being bullied. Beyond that, her bullies are being victimized by the people who are looking on and linking their support of Sarkeesian inextricably with statements like:

"and all these 12 year olds need to shut the fuck up"
"haha, poor whiny neckbeards! get out of the basement!"
"don't worry about all those guys with tiny e-peens!"

I can't stress enough how vitally important it is to be aware that SHOWING SUPPORT does not require you to PUT SOMEONE ELSE DOWN. In fact, it severely undermines the support you show if you go out of your way to insult someone else. EVERYONE'S rights matter. This is true. Sarkeesian knows it, and we know it, and shockingly enough, even these 'trolls' know it. They are freaking out because they have the unrealistic expectation that, if Sarkeesian is successful, everyone will turn on them and start bullying them and denying them rights.

This is NOT TRUE. What we want is to be treated as equals. But we'll never be able to get that message across to these guys because instead of reaching out to them and extending patience and tolerance, the people who are supposedly supporting Feminist Frequency are reinforcing that fear every time they make another of these thoughtless, harmful comments.

It would do everyone good to remember: Every bully has probably been bullied before. That nerdy kid who's mean online? There's a chance he gets beaten up for no reason IN CLASS by his classmates, while some teacher who should care, but doesn't, sits around doing nothing. That guy who's really angry and buff, with all those tattoos about murder, who's screaming that you're a faggot in online gameplay? There's a chance he was sexually assaulted by a relative in his youth, and never reported it, let alone came to terms with it.

The reason abuse is SO AWFUL is that it is a cycle. I don't ask you to have sympathy for them-- you don't have to, I know that some people really make it hard and sometimes, that's just detrimental to solving the problem. But DON'T CONTRIBUTE TO THE ABUSE. I don't care how funny it is or how much you want to fit in to what you have perceived as the mob mentality. Abuse is abuse no matter who you are and no matter what your reasons are.

Don't poison the good thing that Anita Sarkeesian is trying to do by countering abuse with abuse.

Edited to add: Shakesville also has a good article about this:

Saying "it's just the internet" enables the abusers and harassers. That phrase is their ally, their justification. It lets them off the hook for behavior that could be considered criminal if done in person. It shifts the blame to the victim of the abuse by suggesting they just need to, say, "grow a thicker skin" because it's somehow not real because pixels and wifi and anonymous commenting ability.
dev_chieftain: (red)
10:30am:
11:00am: no paycheck info forthcoming.


Mysteriously, we're not getting paid today. 'Probably monday', they say.

Just in case it wasn't clear, this makes me pretty angry.

Yesterday we watched The Return of Captain Invincible, which Danny had sought out either because he wanted to see Christopher Lee be awesome, or hear more music composed by Richard Hartley, or possibly because he wanted to see Alan Arkin.

Bret! Hey, Bret. Remember your concerns about Captain America and how I said maybe there was another movie that did what you were talking about? This is that movie! It is MADE for you. It is about a bitter superhero who's washed up and drunk because McCarthyism screwed up his life, who wants to go back to his glory days in 1950. Also, it's loaded to bursting with the comedy of awkwardness. Honestly I can't imagine any of the gang not liking this movie. It was pretty awesome. But it specifically addressed the things you were talking about, so I thought of you!

We also watched Gattaca last night, which I had watched at age 12 and found kind of slow and boring. Having rewatched it, I must say that 12 year old me was right that it is slow and CAN be boring; but with the help of subtitles and being older, the movie worked for me a lot more. It's a cool plot, kind of complex for a sci-fi movie, honestly; there's a murder mystery going on alongside three separate important character storylines, which is pretty ambitious and works out well BECAUSE the movie's so slow and takes its time to address everything. It's not exactly a subtle movie, except in a couple of places where it is. The world proposed here isn't really a feasible one (but it did make me think of the SMBC about 'genetically perfecting' one's children and how that would immediately get out of hand), but it's still an interesting problem.

One critic apparently already raised this point: I do think it's fair to say that the plot is a little weak since it revolves around the idea of someone who's likely to have a heart condition wanting to become an astronaut anyway. In real life there's a lot of legitimate safety concerns around wanting to make sure that people who go into space are as physically and mentally healthy as possible. Maybe this is not so in the sci-fi setting of Gattaca.

The story ultimately becomes the tale of three concurrent suicides, and that's probably what made this the worst possible choice to watch right before bed. There's a guy who murders someone and is willing to suicide in terms of his career and being put in jail, all for the sake of his pet project; there's a guy who literally commits suicide; there's a guy who knowingly puts himself in a situation that, given the uncertainty of whether his heart will give out or not, is likely to result in his death-- he doesn't expect to make it back, and he doesn't care. There's a sort of cold horror to that that really screams 'yes, this is sci-fi!' to me.

So it was a good film, but overwhelmingly depressing, and maybe a little unnecessarily so.

Oh yeah, also, there was exactly one woman and one black guy. How is it that the movie from the 70's with multiple scenes of half-naked men and women giggling about a supervillain ex-Nazi who wanted to purify New York by killing all of its ethnic groups is less racist and sexist than you, Gattaca? Howwwww?!

Happy mother's day!

Saturday, May 12th, 2012 11:40 pm
dev_chieftain: (chuckle)
I'm pretty excited to see my mom and grandma tomorrow!

Danny baked naan and made curry on Friday, which was really awesome of him. Work and traffic were so bad I was moody at him though, so I felt like a serious jerk. Pathfinder was pretty neat, and involved silly funtimes, and Aigua even kissed the goddess to try to get her to respond in a way that wasn't crying.

I desperately want to fanart Aigua x Big Mama (the goddess's kobold nickname, which Aigua picked up when traveling the surface). I didn't even know I was shipping it, but I do.

Anyway, I got back from Pathfinder so late I mostly passed out after.

Today I was moody-ish all day, and tried to keep it under wraps but didn't succeed very well.

I need to look more at jobs and at classes for the teaching certification I'm hoping to pursue.

And I showed Dustin Coraline, which is still really enjoyable to watch. With the addition of a few Spongebob shorts I knew he'd find as funny as I do.
dev_chieftain: (gulpo)
Melissa's birthday is next week! But for whatever reason (time, probably, since I think her finals might be around the corner next weekend) her birthday party was tonight.

1. Chiropractor trip 2 was all right! I was in much less pain when I arrived than I had been earlier this week, and she's pretty sure a final check up late next week to be sure I don't suddenly seize up and get frozen in a painful rictus should take care of it. While that makes the whole of the experience pretty damned expensive (three trips in two weeks! Blargh!), I do see "not being in pain anymore" as a fair trade. It hurt to sleep, it hurt to sit, it hurt to do anything. I am NOT complaining about being able to do things like actually rest. That is way, way too dear to me to complain about it.

2. Melissa's party! We ate at Joe's Crab Shack, which was pretty all right despite smelling like shellfish and crab (smells that I find gross, but tolerable after a while, I guess), and involved a lot of spirited conversation in that It's a Big Party way. I had a lot of fun. Danny's on such an early schedule that I took him home after, and then met everyone up for mini-golf, which was Melissa's planned birthday outing.

We suck at mini-golf. So much so that the people waiting for us were clearly irate with us by the end of the course. But-- we also had fun. It was humid though, the mini-golf place is right nestled into a water park. Eesh.

Following that, we hit up the grocery store so Melissa could buy a cake for herself. I snagged some green jasmine tea for myself, which turned out to be pretty tasty. And then we played Apples to Apples at Christian's place. Apples to Apples is one of those board games I never remember how to play until someone re-explains the rules to me, and I've only played a few times. Personally, I regretted we couldn't play Scattergories; but I think I have an unusual and possibly unhealthy love for that game and its madness.

3. The bruise: I did tell the chiropractor about the bruises from last time and she seemed to take that into account when prodding my back this time. I may still have a bigger bruise in the morning, I'm not sure. It doesn't feel hot the way the eventual bruises did last time, though, so I have high hopes!
dev_chieftain: (SUBTLE LIKE A NEON-PINK T-REX)
Last night I was catching up with Jenn, and she confessed her mother had been pressuring her to buy a house. The funny thing is, for a few years my parents have been doing the same, off and on.

Here's the parent logic: the housing market's in bad shape! You might be able to get a house for much less than usual, ergo, you should buy one now while you can get a good deal!

Here's the reality that is often so difficult for us to convey to our parents: Just because an item is on sale does not necessitate its purchase. If I do not have the money saved to buy a house, I had no prior plans to buy a house anytime soon, and the house I would actually be happy to have bought is way out of my price range, then it is not a wise idea to try to buy a house right now.

If you weren't already going to buy something, a sale is utterly meaningless! You can't count yourself as saving money when, by definition, you're spending money you wouldn't normally have spent in the first place.

Anyway, parental pressures aside, I know I'm not getting a house anytime soon, and I hope Jenn will wait until she can afford one she actually wants.

Ah, debt juggling. It is not fun! I guess it's sort of necessary, though.
dev_chieftain: (Devpony)
I've been brooding for a few days now Re: Game of Thrones Season 2, latest episode (was it three or four? I don't remember now). I don't care for Demon Pregnancy storylines to begin with, regardless of whether the character has solicited it and doesn't mind. (In a disgusting parody, Boorman's Excalibur, which we watched last night, had a very similar scene. That didn't bother me as much as Uther raping Igrayne while she thought it was her husband and thus allowed it to happen; or, like, the baby being ripped away from her and her screaming powerlessly about it for a while; or like, everything to do with Guenevere, as usual; but it still bothered me.)

Let me say this, though. I didn't really care about the shadow baby being born. It was needlessly gross, but hey, it's HBO. If I didn't see that coming, I'm just being intentionally ignorant at that point.

However. I really didn't enjoy the added, unnecessary scene of Joffrey's sexual perversions. Did this illuminate some previously unforeseen capability for cruelty and obvious wrongness in Joffrey for anyone? Because for me, it was an unnecessarily degrading scene of two women being held at crossbow and rendered helpless by a spoiled, insane boy, and one of them being forced to beat the other one to death with a phallic object that suggested he might instruct his hostage to use it in a sick parody of sex, as well.

Between that brutal murder and the torture scene with the rats and the heated bucket (gee, I always wondered what a 1984 movie would be like...), I have to say I didn't really enjoy myself, and I've been in a kind of bad mood about it since.

Anyway. Excalibur went way too fast and was kind of hilarious, but it did succeed in telling the ENTIRE Arthurian myth, so that was pretty cool.

My adventure to the Chiropractor was scary and weird, and I have an appointment to go back tomorrow to make sure I'm still okay, but it did help with the initial pain.

Of course, the terrifyingly sharp jabs into my spine have left a monstrous bruise in its wake, so I've been icing my back all day to ease it up. I'm kind of scared about going back tomorrow!

ow

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012 09:13 am
dev_chieftain: (risha)
Time for an exciting adventure with a chriropractor! I've never been to one of those before.

asfkgh

Monday, April 23rd, 2012 12:46 pm
dev_chieftain: (SUBTLE LIKE A NEON-PINK T-REX)
good god I've never had a pinched nerve hurt quite so bad

my back is a nightmare
dev_chieftain: (Devpony)
I'm sure for some of you, it's still actually Spring. That's normal in places that aren't here; but this weekend it hit over 100F degrees, and boy, I am not ready for this nonsense. Yuck! Fortunately the forecast suggests it might cool off a bit for the next week, with some rainclouds in to help mitigate the unfaltering heat.

No luck finding the little cat a home, but mom says she has a friend at work who can tell her what days are good days to bring in an animal for the humane society. (I don't want to bring him in on a day he's likely to just get euthanized.) He does seem to be a kitten, and aside from needing to be fixed is a super sweet, friendly sort that I don't doubt would do well in most cat-friendly homes. I do sort of wish we could have him, but our apartment's so small it'd be hard to try to properly introduce him to Cid. Add to that the fact that Cid is terrified of other cats, and it's not really an option.

We watched "The Captains" finally, which is a documentary my parents inexplicably gave us for Christmas. I severely enjoyed seeing the way the other Star Trek Captains responded to Shatner's overwhelming ego, even if in some spots I nearly had to leave, I was so insulted. (I have championed Shatner's work as Kirk in the past, separating the character from the man-- the man, I don't really care for, and find kind of hilarious but also kind of irksome; the character, I actually like, though he's not my favorite ever, or anything.)

With Patrick Stewart, Shatner seemed to be seeking some sense of validation. It's well said that Stewart brought dignity to the franchise, and Shatner seems to want Stewart to promise him that, in fact, he is dignified at least a little. You know, when he isn't busy engaging in a pissing contest with Stewart, who politely endures it.

With Avery Brooks, Shatner literally seems to be looking for a spiritual experience (which was hilarious and strange):

Shatner: ...What happens, when we die?
Brooks: *laugh* Tell me!

With Mulgrew, Shatner seemed willing to treat her the most like an equal-- except when he tried to assert his sexist bullshit notions. On the upside, that lead to us learning way more about Kate Mulgrew than we'd known. (In a good way, I gained a lot of respect for her.) Nothing offends me quite as much as the absolute falsehood of the argument that men are hormonally different from women, and that that is somehow the reason why men and women are different.

Here's the thing. Hormonal changes, with the exception of a mental disorder or a pregnancy, are not noticeable enough to account for differences in behavior. The differences between men and women are societal, and they are learned. They are taught. They are not something that women or men are hardwired to believe in, but it's easy to mistake social conditioning for simple, unchangeable truths because everywhere that a sexist person looks, they're going to see societal reinforcements of their beliefs. Anyone who willfully uses their hormonal imbalances as an excuse to act like a jerk to other people is simply failing to own up to their own behavior. It's cowardly, and it doesn't make you less of a jerk; same goes for people who hide behind being inebriated, or high, or 'stressed out'. If it wouldn't normally be okay, these extenuating circumstances don't magically make it okay.

Likewise, being hormonally different doesn't somehow exclude you from the rest of a standard human condition. A woman is just as capable of doing anything as a man and on an individual level, just as there are some men who wouldn't do well in certain positions of power or don't desire to do certain types of jobs, there are some women for whom the same is true.

Shatner's discussions with Bakula and Pines were honestly of least interest to me; I thought Pines handled himself well, and Bakula always comes across as a pretty nice guy, but Shatner spent more time plying Bakula for sympathy and had little to say to Pines, overall.

All in all, it was fun to watch, and the segments with Brooks, Mulgrew and Stewart were great and frequently had us laughing. I still don't know exactly why my parents gave it to me, but I think they just find Shatner's wacky self-centered nonsense funnier than I do. Don't get me wrong, it's funny; just maybe not a whole documentary's worth of funny. Danny and I both felt the same after. It would be nice to see someone else interview all of these people for a similar project, and to also interview Shatner. Then we wouldn't have Shatner interrupting just about every statement Stewart makes, for example, and that would be sort of nice.
dev_chieftain: (leonard roland)
How homo are you?
dev_chieftain's homo level is [■■■■■□□□□□] 50%!

Though this does mean I cannot have ALL of the homo.

We watched episodes 2 and 3 of GoT Season 2. Further impressions:

-Episode 2-

Man, it's really satisfying knowing what will happen to Theon.

It's really unsatisfying knowing what will happen to almost everyone else.

Would it be so bad if they drastically altered how things turn out for Cersei and Tyrion? I don't think so...

-Episode 3-

Cannot wait for Theon's life to suck more.

Oh, hey, equal opportunity fan-service!

Is it wrong that I would gladly watch a show about Arya and Gendry? Or Loris and Renly and Marjorie? Or Tyrion and Varys? Or just Danerys being awesome? I would gladly watch any of these shows.

I have such a fucking enormous crush on Brienne's actress now. So, if you were curious, my type is "Amazonian badass with scars". Considering how often I've made those in MMOs, I guess I'm not surprised at all.

Brienne, you are the coolest. I am going to fawn over you and sigh girlishly and write poems about your scarred lips. Seriously.

Now it is time for bed!
dev_chieftain: (leonard roland)
So, I use DW primarily, but I still have to log in to LJ to check out about 80% of my FList's posts and comments-- you stubborn bunch! *impotent fistshake*-- so I see various things that are on the LJ log in page when I do. Recently, this included a link to a post going over the various standpoints of certain popular-by-modern-standards authors on the subject of fanfiction.

This is nothing new; a lot of authors dislike fanfiction when they actually see it. I feel all sorts of ways on the subject, but I think the biggest problem with fanfiction is that it is largely reviled by everyone else.

So, here's why I do (and don't) write fanfiction anyway.

1. Fanfiction is a great way to keep yourself interested in something you might otherwise lose interest in.

Take note, published and famous authors! That's right-- people stop giving a shit about things if they don't think of them every waking moment.

I basically consider myself to be stunningly normal when it comes to liking something. I do not, actually, identify as a 'fan'. I can get excited about stuff I like, but I can also zone out and not, in fact, be thinking about anything fannish in particular. I'm more likely to be thinking about my life: bills, work, friends, family, projects, whether I can take fencing lessons with my bad knee, that sort of thing.

This is not so with fans.

Do you know why Harry Potter got seven movies, J.K. Rowling? It is not because you wrote seven books. C.S. Lewis wrote seven books, and at most got three (barely) movies. Mercedes Lackey has written more books than seven and a lot of them would be great movies, but she doesn't have any. Anne McCaffrey wrote a slew of books that would be great movies, but still none.

Why is that?

Well, I'll tell you why. It's because for the duration of the time it took for you, J.K. Rowling, to finish writing your books (books I personally don't have any strong feelings for, to be honest), your fans were obsessed. They managed to keep up that frantic obsession by writing fanfiction, drawing fanart, making fan-parodies, having Harry-Potter-themed-weddings (oh, I wish I was kidding) and doing all sorts of things that meant living, breathing, eating, and sleeping Harry Potter.

So, you can thank your fans-- not yourself-- for your wild and insane success. Oh, and your marketing department, probably.

So why write it?: To keep my focus on a fandom for longer. I have a very short lifespan as a fan of something who's willing to put the kind of effort and love into a fan project needed for fanfiction. Like many fanartists, I at most am likely to write one, maybe two fanfics for something I really liked, with the rare exception of fandoms I get really into. Writing that fanfic or drawing that fanart reminds me of all the reasons why I loved the source material, and even leads me to look for sequels or new merchandise, sometimes.

So why NOT write it? To let me live my damn life! I don't like it when fandom takes up more of my time than my own personal endeavors. I used to roleplay with online crowds exclusively, lacking pals in real life to hang out with (I know, forever alone sad nerd times, right): the problem with this was, nobody wanted to DO original characters. So even if I was in the mood to write me some original fiction, I often didn't because of the peer pressure from my friends who insist that they are NOT creative, who wanted me to waste every waking hour roleplaying, fanficcing or drawing a character that belonged to someone else, instead. If "I have a life, god damn it!" isn't a good enough reason to say NO to fanfic, I don't know what is. It's the most compelling one I can think of by far.

2. Fanfiction is free marketing!

Here's another funny story. You know the Final Fantasy games? I'm sure most people played them because they were already into the idea of video games and whatnot, but I'm not quite the same, here. You see, we didn't have the newest, greatest game systems, and no one in my family knew of RPGs, so it wasn't like we could get FFIII (that is to say, VI) for the SNES while everyone else was playing FF9 brand-new.

Well, thanks to fanfiction of a show called Ronin Warriors, I became deeply enamored of certain fanfic authors, and wanted to read more of their stuff. Even if I didn't know the source material! So I read everything they had on this one site, even fanfic for Final Fantasy VII, and VIII, games I'd seen displays for but never dreamed of playing.

Because of those fanfictions, when we later finally GOT a PS1, I urged my brother to give those games a shot. I was so damn curious what they were really like! Would they be as funny and sweet and sad as the fanfictions I'd read online? Only one way to find out. (Shelling out money!)

Thanks to those games, I ended up buying almost every FF game that would play on that system. I bought FFX, and even Kingdom Hearts because it'd have those same FF characters I loved in it. It didn't take much to hook me, but I needed that little push to even know that the possibility for such games was there at all. Fanfiction led me to buy the real product. I am sure I'm not the only person that this has ever happened to.

So why write it?: I like this thing! So I want other people to like it too. Fandom's a great way to share what I like!

So why NOT write it?: Sometimes, sharing is bad. Especially if it turns out that the people you shared it with want to inject porn into your kid-friendly cartoon; or gore into your paradise; or religious debate into your neato fantasy setting.

3. Fanfiction helps authors to practice, just as any writing exercise does.

This is the most important by far. Fanfiction is NOT an acceptable substitute for writing practice if you're seriously interested in becoming an author someday, but it definitely provides a lot of the same challenges writing a real book does. Can you make something interesting happen in the course of your story? Can you keep people's interest, even if they don't know who these characters are, necessarily? Can you make sure that the story has a clear setting, an understandable PLACE where things are happening?

Can you actually finish your story?

These are all legitimate challenges, and they're tough to get past even with all the help that fanfiction provides. You're being spared the necessity of coming up with your world from scratch, your characters, even your plot, in some cases. You can use fanfiction to practice your prose, or to hone your wit with short stories. You can use fanfiction to shamelessly do all the TERRIBLE things you know you should never do in a real book-- like have everybody fall in love with your Mary Sue self-insert and make your favorite pairings happen, and whatnot. This is no substitute for writing your own, original works, but it still helps improve any original works that you might put out afterward, as long as you're actually striving for improvement.

Also, confidence is a tricky thing. It's important that you feel confident you can finish something you start, and sometimes finishing even a short story fanfiction is a big step on that walk to self-confidence. The value of fanfiction as an original production, something that you can publish in print or sell, is very low*. But the value of fanfiction as a tool for self-development is very high.

So why write it?: To improve! And also, to destress. Everybody has their hobbies. Not everyone wants to write professionally, either, so it's pretty unfair to rag on people who write fanfiction by claiming that they should quit it and write original stuff. I am an aspiring author, but not every potential fanfiction author out there feels the same way. Not everybody wants the same thing out of life, so it's not a reasonable scale to compare people on.

So why NOT write it?: Here's the most dangerous one, I feel. It's very, very easy to spend months, or years, writing nothing but fanfiction. The trouble with fandom is, it's composed of people who are VERY EXCITED about the thing you are currently writing about. They want to see more because they have a shared interest with you. Never mind that they could someday find themselves fans of your awesome, original idea that is now manifest as a book series-- right now they're excited that you're here, writing fanfiction about something that they love. Fandom is a dangerous environment for any creative person, artist, author, whatever, because it's very easy to get wrapped up in fanworks to the exclusion of other projects. The amount of improvement in one's work can be matched or even outstripped by the amount of atrophy that occurs in the other creative muscles, and that's bad for later productivity if you DO want to be an author, or artist, or whatever.

* - I think it's really important to note, here, the distinction made in societal consciousness between fanart and fanfiction. It's been my experience that fanart is generally more well-received by creators than fanfiction; further, I've known multiple fanartists who make their own products using copyrighted intellectual property, and sell those products. (Doujinshi; commissioned fanart; buttons; statuettes; clothes; toys; handmade jewelry; there are a LOT of examples.) A fan-novel could probably be sold in the same way, but it seems that fan-novels are both less common and more openly protested against by authors and whatnot, and I'm really not sure why this is.

What it all comes down to is this: I don't like writing fanfiction, but I also enjoy writing fanfiction. I don't like feeling like my friends are judging, laughing at, or mocking me when I write fiction of ANY kind, but I feel the most like that when I try to write fanfiction or fanfiction-like things (such as "fandom" roleplay). By contrast, I love sharing my fanfiction with people online, and am always happy when people like, or are emotionally affected by, works that I have written, and since I'm still getting my feet wet in the realm of "published original fiction", most of the response I've gotten in the past from people who liked my work was response to fanfiction.

It has value. But it definitely isn't everything.

Now, Game of Thrones Season 2, Episode 1:

I am still really impressed by all the ladies in the show. Generally, I don't really have any interest in reading these books because the setting is unrepentantly sexist in a way that so severely limits women's rights that, for example, it drove Circe insane. That's pretty messed up! But the ladies in the show are cooler than their book counterparts, from what I did read.

I still hate Bran, and wish he'd go away.

They are now green-screening the direwolves. IT IS HILARIOUS.

Before I go to bed

Sunday, April 15th, 2012 01:47 am
dev_chieftain: (rain)
1. Bra shopping

I had to get new bras. )

2. Movie time with Emma

The gist of this is, Mirror Mirror is a romantic comedy, but I was expecting better of it. )

I will say it tried a little, though, and Sean Bean does know how to tug at the heartstrings a bit.

Movie could have used more dwarf scenes. They were seriously the best part.

Oh! And who put in the drawn out "attacked by badly animated CGI puppets" scene? Seriously, that was just-- not funny or entertaining. It just felt long to sit through.

Final complaint: Just say the whole name. "Snow" is a dumb nickname. Every time someone called her Snow, I wanted to reach through the screen and punch them.

Interesting note: I did have dreams the following morning that involved being pestered by the robot other-self of Julia Roberts, who I kept grabbing by the head to snap her neck. She unfortunately kept reappearing and butting in on whatever it was I was doing in my dream, so I kept doing it. It wasn't a violent or evil act in the dream, but it felt odd to have been dreaming about something like that when I woke up. Mostly I was frustrated that it required so much effort, but wasn't permanent because she was a robot.

3. The neighbors

I met our actual neighbor last night. The one who was screaming for help the night I called.

She, as we suspected, thought we were making ALL of the 911 calls, and that we were complaining about noise, and I explained what had happened. Why I had called, and only called once.

She told me how upset she was. (She was a little tipsy and holding an open can of Bud Light, so probably feeling pretty vulnerable.) She's trying to get her son back. She was trying to do a nice thing for friends of hers across the street who'd been evicted by letting them stay at her place. These friends are the ones who fight all the time and have gotten her the eviction notice. These friends are the ones whose presence have led to her boyfriend abusing her, and beating her the night I called. These friends left pot in her apartment, which nearly got her arrested.

I told her how upset I had been that the police did nothing to help her, and that I had called because I was worried about her; never about the noise. Never because I would want to kick someone out of their home.

She said, "I don't know where I'm going to go. And it just-- sucks. Because I never even got to properly introduce myself to you guys, you know? I didn't want to be the shitty neighbor."

I held out my hand and told her my name.

She shook my hand and told me hers.

I told her I hope things get better for her. Soon.

Her boyfriend came home while we were talking, and after he went into her apartment, she leaned in and whispered,

"I'm really glad you did call. Thank you. I'm really glad you did."

And then I cried for a while. I'm really glad I called, too. Even if the police didn't do anything to help her, even if I've contributed to any of the bad stuff, even if we have to live in fear until the eviction is done.

Maybe it made some tiny difference for her to know that someone heard her and cared. I really hope so.

I don't know how to do better than what I tried to do. I can't offer her a place to stay, or a way out. I wish there was something concrete I could do. I do think I might start volunteering somewhere, or at least look more heavily into jobs where I could help people who are really in need, more like this. I had already looked a little, but I was being kind of a wuss about it and letting myself be chased off by the fact that I don't have the prerequisite qualifications yet. Maybe I can get them.

4. D&D

I am still mopey now, and was definitely mopey in the morning, with regards to the conversation I had with the neighbor. D&D fortunately was scheduled for today though, and that helped to keep my mind off of it for the most part. (It's pretty hard to be mopey when your friends are being awesome at you.) We did start late because Bret bailed on us without letting us know earlier in the day, so we were waiting for him to show up; but we had a blast. The group we ended up with has a great dynamic!

Most of the session was spent alternately kicking ass and making fun of the Ice King-- er, Winter King, but we couldn't resist calling him Ice King, really-- as we explored his mysterious castle and took out his creepy army. The gist of things was, back in Sweetgrove, winter had mysteriously started out in the middle of late spring, and everyone was puzzled by the sudden, unseasonal snow. A magic flying boat full of undead warriors crashlanded in town and started attacking everyone. By the time Tamli and Charlie drove off the jerks, they'd already killed a guy; and it turned out that the winter would be eternal if we couldn't return the Ice King's scepter.

We did end up returning it, but then the guy had the gall to ask us to kneel before him. While Charlie politely gave it a shot, Tamli, Alice and Damien were having none of that, and with Charlie's reluctant assistance we were able to trash him. (A lot of this session involved Tamli shouting victoriously over fallen foes, Charlie neatly and efficiently clobbering things when they least expected it, Alice wearing the mysterious Ice Crown and sneaking around in the nude, and Damien discerning magical secrets with his keen eyes and other senses. There was also a point where Damien breathed fire for a bit, which was awesome!)

When we got back, Tamli rushed off to the church to resurrect the civilian who'd been downed by the undead soldiers. She'll be spending the next two weeks helping work the poor guy's farm while he rests up. That frees up Fletcher to be available to help the town guard, who Danny hilariously joked are close to installing a Batman-esque signal with a bow and arrow on to summon him.

Ultimately, we returned back home richer, but it took us long enough that a big group dinner was needed to refuel us afterward.

Tomorrow I get to see my brother, since he's in town. I'm very excited to see him! He also sent me a mystery text around midnight...curious!

DS9, and hey Dustin

Thursday, April 12th, 2012 02:42 pm
dev_chieftain: (Default)
Dustin, I need to make you watch Past Tense. It's a two-parter, but it's also a DS9 episode that is NOT about the actors playing shadows of their real selves. :) Oh, and Explorers, because it's the cutest father/son field trip ever.

I keep coming back to pretty much all of season 7 Deep Space Nine, and having some serious problems with it. I had my little issues here and there all through the show, obviously, but for the most part I think I love it unabashedly. And even though I feel like a big chunk of season 7 tried to ram Ezri down my throat (a choice I don't agree with in the first place, being of the mind that bringing Dax back was a little weird and counter to Trill culture, after making such a big deal about past lives in the earlier seasons), the only thing I really take issue with is the ending.

Detailed spoilers below! )
dev_chieftain: (opinions)
The reason being that Sweden's got some potential to be moving towards gender equality, which is a cause I think is worthy.

Of course, the article itself can't abstain from the doubt that comes of most people thinking about a world in which, gasp, gender is forcibly NOT permitted to be used as a discriminating factor. The comments, even worse, are like poison; nobody gives a shit if women are granted equality, or people who do not identify with any traditional gender roles are given the opportunity to develop from youth.

The article goes to great lengths to say "What about the children?"-- yes, what about the toddlers, who are too young to say they would prefer to be treated as men or women?

Well, what about them in the current set up, assholes? Parents are indoctrinated from THEIR birth to treat girls one way and boys another. Studies have shown that if you tell a parent that the baby they're holding is female, they'll be more overprotective of it and keep it closer. If it's male, they'll be more likely to encourage it to explore. It doesn't matter what gender the child actually is-- both are just as likely to want to stay close or go ranging-- but the parent, who is already socially conditioned, has notions that are transmitted to the child.

The article cites, as if this is proof of some great crime against these lucky toddlers, that some schools in Sweden have removed certain types of interaction or toys because they found that the children would revert to existing societal roles that they're working hard to abolish, otherwise. I don't see this as proof that the kids just love being jammed into the existing social stereotypes-- on the contrary, the parents of these children will have grown up in a society that still gave them the same bias that every other society already has. In the home, the teacher has no control, no ability to help give all children an equal opportunity to speak.

Having grown up in a world where I was always shunned a little bit for being willing to speak in a public forum (a shameful thing for a girl, who is societally expected to shut up and listen when the men are talking), for being eager and quick to learn (how dare I make men feel threatened by being intelligent), for preferring to do sports as a kid to playing with the other girls, whose two-faced nature repelled me, I can honestly say I would have loved a school environment that was as free and open as my home environment. My parents put no expectations on me. Two-year old Dev wore coveralls and had short, curly hair; five-year-old Dev had long hair because it was Cool, swam constantly, and played with dinosaurs and sandcastles in the backyard; nine-year old Dev was pals with the boys, played basketball every day during lunch, was ostracized by her female peers with the exception of one or two girls, and struggled confusedly with the concept that she should already have a boyfriend, which didn't seem desirable or to make any sense. At school, I had to deal with things that didn't make sense to me; when my grandparents visited, I had to deal with old-fashioned and inaccurate expectations of what it meant for me to be a little girl. But at home, with just my parents and my brother, I was who I was. I liked things from both sides and as it turns out, both genders appeal to me.

So to heck with all this fear of the unknown. Anyone who thinks making an actual, concerted effort to change the world so that women get true equality is a bad idea doomed to obvious failure because "gender identity" is "hardwired" by your sexual organs is just afraid of what might happen. They're repulsed by the idea of a world that, to them, is so different from their comfortable norm.

I think they can deal with being slightly uncomfortable and learn to accept it. Moreover, I think they should.

And I think I might have to consider the merits of someday moving to Sweden. You know, if I ever make it as a successful author, or something. That'd be kinda nice.

Edited to add unrelated notes: Man! So I bought these amazing chicken-stuffed-with-spinach-and-cheese things from the grocery store for my lunch. It's just grilled chicken + spinach, cheese and tomatoes, and it was totally delicious. They were on sale, so I'll be having those for lunch at work for a while. Also probably great to have at home for dinner with Danny, so I'm keeping that in mind.

The way they're made is a little clumsy, though. Having had flank steak with peppers and cheese actually cooked inside the meat, I think I could probably do something similar with chicken and whatnot and get to choose what goes in. Sounds like a good choice for experimentation-- stuff 'em with garlic, spinach and onions instead, maybe. I do like the cheese, but I think these'd go best with a small side salad, and cheese is filling, so it wouldn't be totally necessary, per se.

Tonight we're going to be making tacos for dinner, which both Danny and I are looking forward to.
dev_chieftain: (simon belmont)
This is more a note so I don't forget: there's an animated film called Twice Upon a Time. I saw it once, aired on the Cartoon Network, and I liked what I saw of it. Have never seen it since. It apparently is not available on DVD, only having a VHS release, and seems to have been produced by George Lucas. According to Amazon Reviews, there are actually two versions of the movie-- the 'adult' version, and the edited 'family friendly' version. I don't care which, but I'd like to see this again / show Danny. So, note to self. Find it.

WEBCOMICS

So, talking to Bubbles and thinking about it lately, I've decided it might be kind of fun to make a webcomics recommendation type post. Here it is. My insanely long list. The worst part is, I know this isn't all of them. I'll update and add as I remember. I've already been editing in links and a fix to my hilarious mistype of Randall Munroe as Murdock. I don't even know where that came from.

Rating system: G- Safe for all PG- Sometimes there's violence or innuendo, but nothing really NSFW. R- Totally NSFW, either because of violence/gore or sex.

Comics I check/follow regularly:

Sorcery 101
Rating: PG
How I found it: Danny's favorite comic. Soon became mine as well.
Summary: Danny, a blood-bound ex-prince trying to keep a low profile, is learning sorcery to try to help contribute to the protection of his friends. Trouble is, basic sorcery isn't always enough in this crazy, mixed-up world.
Recommend if: You like modern-day fantasy comics; you're interested in a complete, living setting that moves and feels like a real world; you like character-driven comics; you like story comics.

Hark! A Vagrant
Rating: PG
How I found it: Pure luck. Thank goodness I did!
Summary: History comics. Pokes fun at just about everything, but might teach you something while it does. Great style, great sense of humor.
Recommend if: You like non-story comics; you enjoy humorous comics; you like having reading recommendations to learn more about history with your comics.

Gunnerkrigg Court
Rating: PG
How I found it: Kristen's favorite comic. She was right!
Summary: Antimony Carver is a student at the mysterious Gunnerkrigg Court, a highly advanced technological compound that stretches almost beyond comprehension. Across a great divide, and the Annan waters, stands Gillitie Forest, a similarly vast expression of pure nature and wilderness. These places were once united, but something tore them apart. Perhaps Antimony can bring them back together-- only time will tell.*
Recommend if: You like technology vs. magic stories; you like story comics; you like mythology; you like technology and magic learn to get along stories; you like character-driven comics; you like serious stories that are also rife with humor.
*- I probably misspelled something in here to do with the setting!

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Rating: R
How I found it: I'm sure I followed a link sometime. Probably from S*P?
Summary: Updates daily with jokes on just about every subject. Not for the faint of heart, or the short tempered. Nothing is sacred; but, SMBC postulates, nothing should be! Also has SMBC Theater, which are video shorts put together and shared on Youtube.
Recommend if: You love humorous comics; you prefer non-story comics; you enjoy seeing everybody get equally ribbed for their shortcomings.

Buttersafe
Rating: PG
How I found it: 4chan once linked it, providing the first Skeleton Harvester comic to sell it. I was immediately hooked.
Summary: Tuesday/Thursday comics, usually unconnected but sometimes story. Bizarre is the order of the day, sometimes with humor, sometimes with soul-searchy and weird nihilistic undertones instead. If you ever thought to yourself, "Would life be better if Robin Hood made up wild cusses instead of stealing from the rich?" Then this is the comic for you. It has the answers.
Recommend if: you like humorous comics; you prefer non-story comics; you enjoy weird, bizarre, or sometimes disturbing on a philosophical level comics.

Oglaf
Rating: R
How I found it: 4chan; someone posted the first several comics when the site was very new. I noticed the watermark in the bottom of the pages and went to bookmark the site. BEST DECISION OF MY LIFE.
Summary: In a world where magic, sex, and weirdness are all really really common, it can be tough to get by. Sometimes you're an innocent peasant being gnawed on by cock-bats. Sometimes you're an adventurer being seduced by a venomous tree. Sometimes you're just a lowly apprentice, being tricked into sucking cock for a pinecone. You never know what you're going to get; but rest assured, it will almost always be hilarious.
Recommend if: You love humorous comics; you enjoy comics that are comfortable with making fun of sex; you like a mix of story and non-story comics; you play D&D, and wish more people would make comics that reminded you of D&D.

Vattu
Rating: PG
How I found it: It is the newest comic being produced by Evan Dahm of Rice Boy; I picked it up after reading his other works.
Summary: Vattu, a young warrior of a dying tribe, has been given to the new conquerors of her land as a gift by her clan's young and feeble priest. But unlike the others, she does not intend to remain in servitude forever; and she might just liberate her friend, the war-man, to go with her.
Recommend if: You like story comics; you prefer comics with unusual and detailed art; you enjoy comics about alien or otherwise non-human races.

Moon over June
Rating: R
How I found it: Through Josh Lesnick's tumblr.
Summary: Summer is a gynecologist miser who loves corrupting the so-called innocent; Hatsuki is a porn-star and mathematical genius who loves tattoos; they live together, and might even like each other.
Recommend if: you like to see comics featuring lesbian protagonists; you like humor comics; you like porn comics; you are comfortable with misandry (on part of Summer).

Supernormal Step
Rating: PG
How I found it: Followed a link from another comic back in the day because the main character had blue hair.
Summary: Fiona has been transported to another universe, where magic is real, a dictator from her world has secret agents known as 'Hendersons' running things, and monsters try to live in peace with the rest of the population. There's just one problem; Fiona kind of wants to go home, and the technology that could help her has been outlawed.
Recommend if: You like superheroes; you like story comics.

Manly Guys Doing Manly Things
Rating: PG
How I found it: One of my flist linked to it somewhat recently. SCORE!
Summary: Commander Badass is here from the future to reform and help re-introduce the badasses of today into normal society. This is a comic about big, buff dudes doing the kinds of things big, buff dudes like to do. Ain't no shame in that.
Recommend if: You like a mix of story comics and non-story comics; you like humorous comics; you like manly guys; you enjoy video game references and occasionally poking fun at them.

The Oatmeal
Rating: PG
How I found it: Oh, how does anyone find the Oatmeal? but I think it was Dustin or Danny that linked me. Possibly Jenn.
Summary: Started off as a goofy joke-lists type site, but has since evolved to a sort of comic blog dealing with various subjects. Grammar, spicy food, airplane etiquette-- take your pick.
Recommend if: You like humorous comics; you prefer non-story comics.

Savage Chickens
Rating: PG
How I found it: I used to listen to SongsToWearPantsTo, and the guy there did a themesong for this comic. I started reading at once!
Summary: Office humor, cat humor, zombie humor, and chicken humor. Occasionally you will get the bonus of cool stopmotion animations, and your comics will always be drawn on yellow post-it notes (though no longer always of the same size).
Recommend if: You like humorous comics; you prefer non-story comics; you like alternative medium comics, and side art projects (such as the animations).

The Less-than-epic Adventures of TJ and Amal
Rating: R
How I found it: I think this is another one I heard about on 4chan; but I might also have found it through unrelated art posted on DA.
Summary: TJ is a vagabond with a secret history; Amal is a recently outed gay man who was just a few weeks away from potentially finishing medical school, but has been disowned by his family. They go on a road trip together, and become involved.
Recommend if: You like very detailed art; you prefer story comics; you like humor mixed liberally in with your serious comics; you like to see comics featuring gay protagonists.

Zebragirl
Rating: PG
How I found it: Zazie, or possibly Varnia, linked me years ago.
Summary: Once upon a time, Sandra's friends were playing with a magic book and accidentally turned her into a demon. Things went downhill from there.
Recommend if: You like comics that start out humorous, but become very serious and later surreal; you prefer story comics; you like wildly complex settings with multiple parallel dimensions.

El Goonish Shive
Rating: PG/R depending on your feelings re: transformations
How I found it: Ages ago, I don't remember exactly how!
Summary: In a place called Moperville, there are some strange things going on. Some of it has to do with magic; some of it is the fault of alternate realities, and immortal beings; and some of it is the fault of young boy genius Tedd, who loves alien technology and transforming himself and his friends into various things.
Recommend if: You like story comics; you like character-driven comics; you enjoy transformation as a concept (cross-gender and cross-species alike); you like a mixture of humor and seriousness in your comics, erring on the side of humor, usually.

Order of the Stick
Rating: PG
How I found it: Some years back; people talked about it, so I looked it up.
Summary: The Order of the Stick are a group of high-level adventurers. They are working to prevent the opening of extra-dimensional gates that will allow some terrifying evil god to come forth and destroy existence as they know it, but getting there is no easy matter.
Recommend if: you like stick-figure comics; you like D&D humor; you like humorous comics with the occasional serious one thrown in there; you don't mind an irregular update schedule; you aren't intimidated by an enormous archive.

Snowflakes
Rating: G
How I found it: This is a side project done by the guys who did Captain Excelsior Stupendous and still do SMBC.
Summary: What if a bunch of cute little orphans in a snowy, remote orphanage started to fight over classroom politics? What if some of them thought they were vikings? Well, this is all about that.
Recommend if: you like goofy kids-with-big-imaginations stories; you prefer story comics; you like humorous comics; you have no reverence for nuns.

The Comics Curmudgeon
Rating: PG
How I found it: Pure chance!
Summary: The Comics Curmudgeon reviews various newspaper comics and either lightly teases them, ramps them up to hilariously ridiculous proportions by assuming they will get far more dramatic than newspaper comics ever actually are, or flat out mocks them. Thanks to this guy, I read Apartment 3-G sometimes. He's pretty rad.
Recommend if: you like newspaper comics, but not too much; you like humor; you want to make fun of Family Circus.

Goblins
Rating: R
How I found it: Looking for D&D comics years ago.
Summary: A group of Goblins from a small goblin village decide to become adventurers, but that's harder than they thought. Quickly escalates from a light-hearted, somewhat carefree adventure about the Goblins becoming heroes to their people against adversity and fate itself, and into a depressing epic about the suffering of the Goblins that ought to become more than they were, and various others that know of them in the setting.
Recommend if: You like humorous comics that become ridiculously dark; you like non-standard webcomic designs; you like D&D humor; you like goblins.

Wondermark
Rating: PG
How I found it: Through Dinosaur Comics
Summary: Usually non-sequitur but sometimes sequential comics made using wood-block prints and often completely random, moderately philosophical dialogue added to the often quasi-Victorian scenes. Features the occasional appearances of shapeshifting alien Gax, and madness.
Recommend if: you like humor; you like philosophy; you enjoy woodblocks and alternative webcomic media; you prefer non-story comics but don't mind the occasional story comic in the midst of the rest.

Dinosaur Comics
Rating: PG
How I found it: Probably thanks to Skye, actually!
Summary: Every day, T-Rex and his fellow dinosaurs go about their business. They do almost the same thing during those days, but they talk about anything and everything under the sun.
Recommend if: You like dinosaurs; you like philosophy; you like random medical facts; you like humor comics; you prefer non-story comics.

Questionable Content
Rating: PG
How I found it: Jen, back in the day
Summary: Marten and his friends live out their every day lives in a pseudo-futuristic setting where PCs are AIs, and can be put into various shells that allow them to walk around as humans do.
Recommend if: you like character-driven plots; you like romance as a central comic element; you like humor and drama in about equal parts; you think robots are pretty neat; you like story comics with the occasional non-sequitur.

Darths and Droids
Rating: PG
How I found it: The guys were reading it, so I picked it up too.
Summary: Using screenshots from the Star Wars films as art, the comic covers a long-standing tabletop RPG campaign wherein the players are playing the characters in the movies. Makes extensive light of the prequel trilogy; has just recently gotten to A New Hope.
Recommend if: You like Star Wars; you like humor comics; you like D&D humor; you don't mind making fun of D&D or Star Wars; you think it's entirely plausible that Jar Jar Binks was made up by a twelve year old girl.

Badly Drawn Kitties
Rating: R
How I found it: Years ago, this comic was taken down and removed. But it seems to have been recently reborn and is updating again! I found it after noting that I'd read it before and that it was gone, earlier today. Happily reunited! Ahh.
Summary: Slice-of-life, joke-a-day comic about Lydia and Lucy, two cat-ladies who are sassy roommates.
Recommend if: You like humor; you prefer non-story comics with some minor continuity.

Comics I still check sporadically, even though they are not on my list: )


Comics I no longer read, but read once: )

This is so long my shoulder hurts. Argh.
dev_chieftain: (gulpo)
-Important stuff-

Check this out: Education Petition: Help Brooke Harris of Michigan get her job back

What's the story: Brook Harris assisted some interested students of hers in attempting to organize a fundraiser for Trayvon Martin. They live in a world where they, too, are threatened by trigger-happy "watchers" who automatically suspect them of doing wrong simply because of the color of their skin. So, they wanted to learn more about what was happening, and try to make a difference. Harris brought their proposal forth, and was suspended, then fired for it.

Their reasons are that teachers presumably shouldn't be 'activists'.

The message being sent here is, "We don't want the children of this world to speak out against oppression, wrongdoing, racism, sexism." And that is WAY out of line. Brook Harris was doing the right thing, and by my book, she sounds like a great teacher, genuinely engaged with her students and caring about them.

Please sign the petition, or at least pass it to someone who might consider doing so. Heck knows I'm doing what I can to do the same.

-Just plain normal stuff-

So, last night I joined in for the tail end of Dustin's Legend of the Five Rings module. It was really awesome! He'd made pregenerated characters for everyone, and the system was really easy to pick up. I had picked the warrior/poet, because I kind of like the wacky iaijustu, haiku-for-every-kill dealie. I got to try my hand at it, which led to a couple of decent haiku along the way and Derek laughing a lot! Derek was playing a druidic priestess who abhorred violence, which was troublesome, since there were blood mages around. Dyrr was playing a badass tattooed monk who was partially on fire most of the time.

It was fun, but afterwards I was terribly sleepy! Despite that, I got very little rest. Cid kept crawling on me for some reason. Eventually she settled for sitting on my chest and staring down at me for a while.

Edit: Man! This "article" about the Hunger Games tiptoes around discussing gender and race issues, but the ending really bugged me:

"Last, Rue (who’s played by a biracial actress in the film and is described in the book as having “satiny brown skin”) may narratively function somewhat like Leatherstocking’s Indian companions, yet she is far from the clichéd “noble savage” type.

Some racist moviegoers, who may be reading white-supremacist fantasies into the survivalist aspect of the story, have complained that Rue looks black (whatever that means). In truth Rue, Katniss and Peeta exist in a new kind of frontier that is a dystopian nightmare but one that has its utopian moment — which may largely account for the film’s popularity — in that race and gender stereotypes have become seemingly irrelevant."

-From the New York Times

I don't really agree with these two about gender precisely, but it's the sort of disagree that partially comes of actually being a woman, as opposed to trying to understand what it's like to be a woman who is frequently disappointed by a lack of interesting female characters in entertainment. So I think they're doing all right at at least talking about it, and being open to the idea that masculinity and femininity are kind of bizarre and arbitrary concepts.

(For example, did you know that during the time of Beowulf or the Canterbury Tales, women were assumed to be the sex-crazy gender who just loved having sex too much to stop?)

Anyway, the important thing to me is the end quote, though. The commentary that there's no divide based on race in the Hunger Games's setting simply because Katniss was capable of befriending Rue is absolutely ridiculous. There's an awful lot of white people in Panem; in fact, the only black people seem to mysteriously be relegated entirely to District 11. I hear in the books, Katniss's skin color is olive, with a sort of additional implication that that's relatively common for District 12. (Olive, for the record, usually refers to Hispanic skin colors-- so that might not be unintentional on part of the author, who didn't strike me as very subtle about the issues she was trying to tackle). There are also notes within the books (so I've heard from reading up on them, the internet at large, and people who have read the books) about the fact that being blond, blue-eyed and white is desirable in Panem. So to claim that race is overcome by the setting, while a nice sentiment, is totally untrue. Race and class matter in Panem; that's part of what's so awful about it.

What really irritates me, though, is the comment about Rue not being a noble savage stereotype. I'm sorry, did she or did she not

a) possess incredible wilderness skills outstripping the hero's
b) inexplicably but helpfully befriend the hero when she was in need
c) heal the hero with wilderness knowledge and magic nature medicine?

Right, she did all three of those things. And the most important thing about noble savages is, the stereotype exists because these characters are not the main character, and they frequently die. Check, and check.
dev_chieftain: (simon belmont)
Apparently Wisconsin has decided that women don't deserve equal pay to men; read all about it.

This is utter bullshit. This has to stop. Apathy and defeatism are the disgusting slugs in the belly of the internet.

I have some congressfolk to write.

Edit: Honestly, I read this one too the other day, and while I consider it more of an opinion piece, I still think it's important and accurate. I've definitely experienced what Valente is talking about here; I can say something MANY TIMES, but my companions-- male or female, but especially male-- will later say the same damn thing as if it is their unique and original idea.

This is not slapstick; this is extremely frustrating, this is being ignored, and this is being shunned and treated as a second class citizen.

Pointing this out repeatedly to Danny got him to start crediting me my ideas. It's easy when you're not the person being ripped off-- when you're not the artist whose work is being copied, or the author whose words are plagiarized-- to laugh and go 'what are these people even talking about? I guess I understand in theory, but it's not like it's that big a deal'.

Belittling the frustrations of other people-- laughing at them while also refusing to acknowledge that you are hurting them-- is no way to solve a problem. I'm very grateful that Danny eventually came around and started to point out when something is my idea. It makes me feel a LOT more willing to excitedly tell people when something is Danny's idea, as well.

But you know what still happens around the D&D table? Whenever it's my turn during a combat, I usually have to repeat myself four or five times. Especially if I have a question. This doesn't happen to the guys around the table, and I assure you, it's not because my voice is of a more dulcet tone. This is something I wish could be improved. Until it's acknowledged as a problem, however, it can't be fixed. And in the meantime, it is being ignored.

To immediately demonize a woman for daring to criticize someone else-- no matter who they are-- is criminal. It is an effort to silence that woman and keep her from speaking, and that is not a worthy or acceptable aim.

To ignore, shun, or laugh off a woman's input is equally criminal.

Listen to the people around you. All of them. Even the ones you don't like very much. We are all humans. We all deserve the right to speak, the right to live, and the right to try to make our lives better.

The government we have right now is doing a shit job of helping that to happen. We are entrenched in outdated notions of societal structure, and the importance of religious affiliation to societal integrity. YOU HAVE THE POWER TO CHANGE THAT from the ground up. Make it happen. Don't vote in politicians who're willing to do crap like this.

Please, listen to me. Listen to us. Women are people, not prizes, not children, not possessions.

And in a moderately related note, it is this attitude, this backwards creepy sexism, that makes me reject the 'marriage' custom. The ritual selling of the woman to the man, dolled up to look as attractive as possible so he will feel like he's getting something valuable? No thanks. I wouldn't inflict that one someone I love. I certainly wouldn't accept anyone who claimed to love me trying to inflict that on me.
dev_chieftain: (Default)
The difficulty with being someone who is denied a right that is treated like a privilege is, the people doing the denying will not want to admit that they are doing or believing something wrong. They will so violently work to deny that THEY are responsible that the issue becomes totally obscured by their attempts to lash out at the people who would dare point out to them that something unfair is being done.

Right now, I'm talking about sexism specifically; but this applies for all of it. It's far easier to get defensive and deny that you, personally, are responsible for even the tiniest part of a problem than it is to gracefully accept that there is a problem, and to resolve to work as hard as possible not to be a part of the problem in the future.

Number one important thing: This story pretty much identifies my number one problem with the anti-birth-control legislations going around lately:

"I was forced to be pregnant" on Tumblr
"I was forced to be pregnant" on Livejournal

(Same story, two different places in case you prefer one over the other as a blogging media.)

Pregnancy should always be the choice of the person who actually has to deal with it. Men get ridiculously entitled about women, sex, and children. Society indoctrinates them to believe that yes, they Deserve To Win the Woman-- that Woman is a prize-- and that if they don't, it's just because they didn't try hard enough to earn it. And worse, society also indoctrinates men and women alike to treat women as never fully achieving adulthood. Is it acceptable for someone to call a man 'boy' to dress him down? No. But any time anyone wants to assert their superiority over a woman, they can and will call her 'girl' (or go straight to cursing, if that's their preference), and it's not even considered weird.

This has been on my mind for a while. It's difficult to listen to the radio, because if I do, nine times out of ten the songs are about how the woman in an imaginary relationship needs to take back her cheating / abusive / negligent / otherwise cruel boyfriend because, really truly, he actually loves her.

How about 'Pina Colada'? The set of the story is that the man was looking through the classifieds for some new woman to fuck because he was bored of the old one. But, silly me! It's ALL OKAY because the ad he answers turns out to be hers, so they deserve each other and it all works out. How about Cat Stevens' 'Wild World'? I want to like Cat Stevens, but I just can't when the whole purpose of that song is to tell someone he is addressing as 'girl' that she shouldn't go out into the world and away from him because she'll be sorry, it's way dangerous. It's also present in multiple Beatles songs, and much as I love the Beatles, I always felt especially uncomfortable about the following two songs for related reasons:

Better all the time
I used to be cruel to my woman, I beat her
and kept her apart from the things that she loves
Man, I was mean, but I'm changing my scene
and I'm doing the best that I can

Run for your life
Well, I'd rather see you dead, little girl
than to catch you with another man
You better keep your head, little girl
or I won't know where I am

You better run for your life if you can, little girl
Hide your head in the sand, little girl
Catch you with another man, that's the end, little girl

Now, what really bothers me about all this-- the lyrics in the music, the general refusal to accept women as equals and the intentional separation of them by use of diminutive pet names and terminology-- is that it's abusive all the way down to the core. It's manipulative, and it's ugly, and the worst part of it all is that nobody wants to acknowledge it.

If I talk about these issues, I get labeled an "angry feminist" by my coworkers or friends. If I point out that some of these coworkers and friends ARE in and of themselves sexist (especially those that are female, because it freaks me out to have other women telling me that I should do all these societal standard things because it's pretty unladylike not to), not only do they become outraged, they become immediately defensive. Beyond that point, NOTHING I SAY will get through. It doesn't matter if I have proof of the sexism or not. The response I get is not "what? I don't want to be sexist! How am I sexist?"-- it's "How DARE you infer that I could possibly be sexist, little girl!"

Another recent example that seriously depresses me caught my attention late last night, before I went to bed. Tarol Hunt, that guy who does that comic called Goblins, got into another internet fight with someone accusing him of being a rape sympathizer.

Here's the rundown:

-Goblins and Gunnerkrigg Court are being pitted against each other in a relatively meaningless internet competition to vote for your favorite webcomic. They're in the final round, and unfortunately, it's an internet contest, so lots of people are badmouthing both comics back and forth.

-A presumably female commenter commented claiming that Goblins' most recent page had some nasty rape implied on it, and that she was offended, and that the comic was misogynistic.

-Predictably, the fans exploded over it. Some hate Goblins for being misogynistic now, while others hate this woman and are trying to send her death threats for criticizing their beloved comic.

-Worst of all, Tarol Hunt's response was to Very Maturely insist that no way, he totally isn't a rape sympathizer or a misogynist! And how dare she call him that! He's very, VERY offended that she hasn't offered him an apology for her totally unfounded statement.

Now, here's the thing. I've been reading Goblins for ages. And the most recent page DID briefly confuse me. Because of the paneling and the choice of words on part of the demon, even though I was fully aware that the demon should be addressing the AU MinMax (the blonde bald guy), and not Kin (the naga), I wasn't immediately sure. I was confused, and had to reread the comic, wondering why he'd called her a bitch after she did what he wanted, let alone threatened her with being attacked by demons in the afterlife.

Now, for the record, I didn't assume rape; I assumed violence. But it wasn't completely clear, and I knew what SHOULD be happening. So some of that is poor word choice. I think having a demon call a guy 'bitch' isn't necessarily the most obvious choice when there's a woman right there, especially to someone who might just be looking at the front page of the comic, and not reading through the archives. So, while I think the woman totally overreacted, I also think Tarol Hunt seriously overreacted.

He also has gotten into arguments about this sort of thing before, and to be quite honest, I was disappointed with the level of his maturity handling it then. The fact of the matter is, he's really sensitive about this issue. There are only three or four female characters in his comic, and one of them is an in-joke about a man playing a sex-object female character in a D&D game.

Kin's backstory? Is that she was enslaved for years, which she spent being beaten daily and then raped while she was still injured.

So regardless of his personal feelings with regard to this woman's misunderstanding of the latest page's intended effect, Tarol Hunt ought to know better than to complain loudly and angrily that he is being unfairly persecuted for having a potentially misogynistic comic. My guess? He feels really uncomfortable about such accusations, because they have some basis in reality. When you only have four female characters, and two of them are embarrassing stereotypes, I think it's easy for an intelligent person to connect the dots and worry 'oh, geez; this doesn't reflect well on me. One of my characters is a slutty bimbo stereotype, and the other is a rape-survivor who fell in love with the first guy she saw after she was freed from her torturer.'

There is reason for Tarol Hunt to be concerned that his comic might be construed as misogynistic because it is definitely sexist, and it has a dearth of background female characters just chilling out and being female characters, not having any tragic sexual violence visited upon them. Is it misogynistic? Well, I'd like to say it isn't. But I'm biased-- I clearly don't have much of a problem with it because I continue to read the comic, despite any gender imbalances going on.

But is Tarol Hunt an adult who should know better than to start a shitstorm over a moderately valid complaint? Yes, he is.

Stuff like this IS male privilege realized. Instead of just quietly clarifying, "I hope this page is clear; this is what's happening in the page, and if multiple people feel that it's not clear, I can redo it", he goes and starts shit on the internet. Am I supposed to believe it's sincere when he then belatedly posts in his blog, "Guys, REALLY, please stop threatening this woman on my account"?

It'd feel a lot more genuine if he wouldn't start the shitstorms in the first place.

Placeholder

Friday, April 6th, 2012 01:33 pm
dev_chieftain: (simon belmont)
I have a comic script to send off, and it got delayed first by Danny losing his job, and second by the scary nonsense with our neighbors threatening us and themselves and all that. Once I finish my comic script, I will blog constantly, until you're all very sick of me. I very probably will write one Deep Space 9 fanfic to deal with my dissatisfaction RE: Season 7, the finale, etc.

In the meantime, I want to point out one of the things I forgot to mention annoying me about The Hunger Games. The entire society of Panem being strawmen really bothered me. It just feels lazy.

Back to work for me.
dev_chieftain: (risha)
It sounds like the neighbors will have to be gone within five business days.

Having trouble getting hold of the dealership to smooth out the loan problem, unsurprisingly. Jerks.

Been watching DS9 again, we're in the final episodes and the finale has started. Do I buy Ezri/Bashir? I guess, a little. I keep wondering what would have happened if Terry Farrell hadn't left the show. Also, O'Brien and Bashir are like a couple of old women at this point, it's hilarious. Particularly amusing interchange:

Bashir: So, as a hero, you just name anything, and we'll see to it that you get it!
NPC Ilario: Anything?
Bashir: *firmly* Anything at all, Ilario.
NPC Ilario: Well...actually there is something! I've always kind of wanted to go the holosuites with you and Chief O'Brien.
Bashir: *shocked tone* With us? to the holosuites?
O'Brien: Can't be done.
Bashir: Absolutely not.
O'Brien: I mean, you should go to the holosuites.
Bashir: Yes, of course.
O'Brien: But just, not with us.
Bashir: Mm-mm.
NPC Ilario: But--
Bashir: Anything else-- and we will see to it. See you later!
[And they go to the holosuite together]

We also watched Flight of Dragons, which is the other movie Rankin/Bass released in 1982 (The Last Unicorn is still my favorite. I liked the story better, I think). It was fun, but a little goofy. I did like steel-nipples knight guy, and the awesome archer lady with her shimmering red locks of hair.

All the ladies were weirdly cross-eyed in this one though! and the dragons were too goofy, but that was kind of neat in its own weird way.

The ending was depressing! Oh, but since the magic users' crowns were the source of their powers, I thought that was pretty hilarious. It reminded me strongly of the Ice King!

Which brought me back to Adventure Time. I've seen some amazing Adventure Time fanart, my favorite of which is the huge buff adult guy with a beard, dressed in Finn's cute bear-cap and shorts; but I still think it'd be more hilarious (and possibly appropriate) if one assumes that the Adventure Time style isn't simplified at all. After the Mushroom Wars and re-awakening of magic, Finn really does look like that-- with the weird beady eyes, and so on-- because humanity has been forever changed.
dev_chieftain: (Devpony)
Man, my journal's been a downer like all week! Except that clip from DS9. (Which is a secret downer. A sting-downer, if you will.) SO here are the good things:

1. Danny should be okay! He recently lost his job and for reasons I don't feel comfortable sharing here, things were pretty scary for a week there. But it looks like he'll probably be okay, and even able to make rent (which is good, because I'm not THAT well off!), so hooray!

2. I'll be finishing my delayed (for the above reasons) comic script, and am very glad of it.

3. We wrapped up the AD&D game with an epic (and hilarious) finale on Tuesday. The long and short of it is this: We kidnapped Bishop Dinta, and last time Iris had turned him in to a statue as a medusa before she accidentally died. We went against her religious beliefs (the church of Sulafta is against resurrection in the permanent sense, since it bucks the natural order) and had her resurrected, which severed her connection as a Sulaftan cleric, but turned her into a mischievous pixie (appropriate!). Then we turned Dinta back into himself after acquiring the Helm of Opposite Alignment, which turned him good.

Ostensibly, we were doing this to see if he was unsalvageable and still wanted to summon Orcus. What we hadn't forseen was that he DID want to do so...so we could banish Orcus's evil forever. So he summoned Orcus! And we fought mightily, and bested derp-tastic 2E Orcus, the demon-lord. Esra's main contribution to this fight: rod of cancellation to break Orcus's staff of power. Llewain, Sabine and Kelta did the bulk of the work.

4. Just got accepted into [community profile] edge_of_forever as Julian Bashir! I am super excited. Trudy dragged me over.

5. Pathfinder tonite!

6. We've been finishing more of DS9 season 7 and it's such a pleasure to pick that back up again. Oh, DS9. Why you so good? Mmmm. ♥

Most recently, we watched an episode last night about a communications array in Dominion space. The premise was that a crew of soldiers long overtaxed by being kept on the front were stuck there guarding the relay because there weren't enough people to relieve them. Included some really awesome scenes with exceptional extras, and we're finally getting to see Ezri developed. Regrettably, the kinda nice engineer guy she almost might've developed a romance with died in battle at the end. Bummer! Meanwhile, Bashir brought along recordings of Vic Fontaine's singing, which lent a creepy but awesome feeling to the battle that followed with the Jem'Hadar.

Episode dealt with Sisko's fear that the names of the dead in the war were blurring together in his mind and he wasn't paying proper respect to those who'd died serving; Quark's continued mild racism and fear towards humans and their 'penchant for violence', opposite Nog's kind of crazy devotion to Starfleet. Nog is such an interesting character. Ezri's first time on the battlegrounds was awesome, and an interesting parallel with Bashir, who I've come to think of as being the rookie, being more experienced and older than her since he's no longer what he started as.

Best of all was Rom trying to be a singer, of course. Oh, Rom!

The next episode after that was like the umpteenth time Dukat has tried to get Kira to love him, and utterly failed. I would not be able to tolerate these plots if she ever changed her mind, but instead I got to grin as she kicked lots of ass and Dukat utterly failed. Oh, Kira! I just love everybody today!

7. And, Danny got a copy of Flight of Dragons, which is a Rankin-Bass film about science v. magic (a theme I often like) that is properly animated, unlike Ralph Bakshi's stuff. Woo! So we'll be watching that sometime this weekend.
dev_chieftain: (simon belmont)
I have been thinking about babies because I have a coworker who often relates stories about hers and I have come to an inescapable conclusion. The only reason I want to have babies biologically is to further a narcissistic sense of ownership. "The family line". I want babies for like, Picard mourning his lost family in Star Trek: Generations reasons. Not for any other reasons. (And notably, not even for those reasons when I am experiencing near-breakdown emotional vulnerability over an existential crisis about mortality and the nature of life as suffering.)

Otherwise, I can't think of a single good reason not to adopt. It is entirely because part of me does take pride in my genetic make-up-- this translates simply to the fact that I think I'm hawt, and anyone who doesn't agree is sorely lacking in taste--that I even consider ever allowing myself to become pregnant. Why else than to vainly proclaim to the world that my genetic code is awesome would I bring a child into this world? There are plenty of children already around to adopt.

To this end, I sort of expect my younger brother to get married and have kids so I don't have to. Like, seriously. I might be as invested in his romantic endeavors as I am partially because I have decided (for no good reason) that it's his responsibility to make babies which I can dote on from the safe position of "aunt".

I think this potentially makes me extremely weird. Not because I don't want babies of my own, just because I have such weird reasons for wanting them, and for expecting my brother to procure them to ensure the continuation of the family line. Back to work now.

Edit: Now topical! I have now heard of October Baby, which blessedly has low critical ratings, though not for any particularly straightforward reason. The long and short is, this is an indie propaganda Catholic pro-life movie about an 'abortion survivor' who gets upset that her mom didn't want her, goes to find said mom, and then through Catholic counsel comes to forgive her mother for being so danged awful.

I sort of hope this movie will not make back its budget; it's 3/4 of the way there on just its opening weekend, however, which alarms and depresses me. I think every mother should be willing to have her child. (Allow me to explain: this means that no woman should be forced to become a mother if she is unwilling. It does NOT mean that every woman should be ready to pop out babies.) An unwanted child is treated to a pretty sour experience, and there are plenty of kids up for adoption who need homes. Why not help those kids first, instead of trying to prevent women from having the choice to live their lives however they want?

The thing that annoys me most about all of this is that Judao-Christianity contains the tenet "live and let live". It is not "living and letting live" to refuse to acknowledge other ways of life as valid and acceptable for the people who choose to live those ways. You don't have to approve. You don't have to do anything except agree NOT to harm or ostracize people simply because of differing beliefs. Blargh.

I do think it's a lovely testament to how unknown this film currently is that multiple articles listed The Hunger Games as the only new movie to come out this last weekend. Go The Hunger Games. I'm more and more tempted to watch you all the time.
dev_chieftain: (Default)
Here's the number one reason I'm not interested in getting into computer programming.

Disappointingly, I still have to deal with it in my work life occasionally. For me, this is when people will re-explain a problem using terminology specific to their profession ad nauseum in an attempt to make it clear that you're wasting their time, and actually it's all on you. This is the number one behavior of COWORKERS that I dislike about my job. The handling of the upper management is bad for other reasons, but I like my coworkers, with this one exception. What's worse, I sometimes do this to other people. So what can I take away from that?

-Some of it is discrimination
-Some of it is just that it's really hard to communicate with people. As the person explaining, you may have no frame of reference by which to actually explain to the person you're addressing. As the person being explained to, you may have no means to successfully convey what the problem is in a way that the first person will actually understand. (This is the biggest problem: we have HOUR LONG DISCUSSIONS sometimes when someone can't figure out what the heck I mean because having it described out loud is too confusing; this is nothing on them, and everything on how stupid our processes are. When you SHOW someone the problem, the process is infinitely faster.)

I mostly deal with the exact thing mentioned in the article in my personal life; people online will comment telling me to "lighten up" when I post about an issue I find important, which is hardly friendly and certainly not helpful. But I do it too! "Lighten up" is such a useless piece of advice, but we all think it's useful at one time or another, when we're worried and don't know how to help our friends out with something stressful. It SEEMS like a useful thing to say at the time, but that's a place where you have to put yourself in your friend's shoes. They're stressed out. They would probably like NOT to be stressed out. Saying 'lighten up' is the same as saying 'walk it off'. Utterly unhelpful, callous, and unsympathetic. And man, guys, I don't want to associate with people who are like that.

I definitely can't stand a society that is based around demeaning and demoralizing other people like this. The worst of it, to me, though, is when women buy into it.

I hate women that work really hard to "blend in" to the male-oriented culture by putting down the rest of their gender to try to seem cool. You know the kind-- "nerd" girls who are quick to remind you, "haha, WOMEN, right? They're so crazy and ruled by emotion! Not like ME though, I'm one of the guys"; or "normal" girls who will say, "Oh, well, it was that time of the month! you know how crazy girls get then!" to try to exempt themselves from responsibility for their actions. Or the worst-- "nerd but still totes normal, guys" girls, who will be quick to e-peen with you over some stupid trivia, and just as quick to remind you 'But my favorite color is PINK! I'm so CUTE!'.

Come on, fellow ladies. Let's be cool about this. And let's be cool about our own gender, okay? We're actually pretty dang awesome.

This was already on my mind, obviously, because we recently watched Being John Malkovich and Adaptation, which while interesting films are still the kind of romance that exemplifies the idolization of the girl that the man is in love with, without treating her as an actual equal. You know, romantic comedy; where the guy's awkwardness is somehow supposed to be adorable, and make up for the fact that he doesn't actually care about the girl, about her life, about what she does or wants to do; that he doesn't see her as an equal, but a prize.
dev_chieftain: (risha)
Not much to say right now; been working on comic collaboration script's edits (I have an alarming fear that my artist partner will take one look at the finished product and go "oh, well, even though I sought you out, this is trash and you suck". Some might even call it unfounded! BUT YOU KNOW, confidence issues. So...so just a few more edits before I send it to her, but I swore to myself I'm sending it by the end of the night so she can at least tell me if she'd like me to change anything!)

Did show Danny both Interstella 5555 and Being John Malkovich, the former of which is still rad as hell, the latter of which is more hilarious and way creepier than I remembered. There is simply no way not to hate John Cusack's character and how totally scummy he is. But you know, Katherine Keener's character is also evil; and Cameron Diaz's character is still totally weird. (But like. Likeable weird.) Having shown Danny Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind before, I can definitely say on rewatching I like this film better. I think I like Adaptation best of the three, but the concept behind Being John Malkovich is pretty fun.
dev_chieftain: (rain)
Adventure Time is awesome, but the nature of the setting and story is such that it is not actually stopping me from getting back in my freaking out over mortality place. The episode about Jake wanting to see the prophecy of his death through to the end was totally rough on my heartstrings. Damn it, Finn, I totally think your solution is awesome. Even if it makes me all sad.

In less creepy (to me) thoughts, I've been thinking about how I would handle certain elements of running tabletop games that go longer and are more deadly than the ones I've run before.

Resurrection: Now, I think resurrection should totally be available to the party, but it pisses me off when it's got never got an effect. Here's how I think it'd be interesting to handle.

*Cost: cheap as dirt. It's easy to get your friend revived.

*Urgency (part the first): If you do it quickly, then the consequences are pretty much invisible. As the resurrectee, you would essentially have a sense of having gone into the light for a moment, but then you came back. Disconcerting and weird and probably a little nervewracking, but you'd get over it after a bit. (Roleplaying will be enforced by electric cattle prod.)

*Urgency (part deux): If you take a full day to resurrect your friend, they will be Messed Up when they come back. Because in the time it took you to resurrect them, they were reborn elsewhere. They've started to forget their past life already. As the resurrectee, it'd be difficult to remember names, places. Important details of your past might be forgotten. Also, you might have the strangest urge to go back to the life you are now denied. You might even follow those urges, depending on how you want to play it. (Roleplaying will be enforced by a demonic stare.)

*Urgency (the other part): If you do it after your friend's body has started to rot (this would vary in terms of time based on terrain; a body in a swamp might rot faster/more easily than a body in a dry desert castle), there is a chance that your friend will come back undead. The amount of forgetting is higher, the difficulty of re-connecting with your friend is greater. This also puts back the use of rituals like Gentle Repose, which might do things** to the friend's soul while also preserving their body for resurrection purposes. As the resurrectee who is not Repose'd, you would essentially be like a zombie self, remembering only the most bittersweet pieces of who you once were. You could still become a whole person over time, perhaps, but you would need to make new memories to fill the void left by the old. See below for if Repose'd. (Roleplaying will enforced by the banshee howl of the unknowable creatures of the id.)

**- A body held in Gentle Repose would essentially also trap the soul, preventing it from proceeding on to the next life as it should. While resurrection in this particular idea would usually account for stillbirths (so and so was brought back to life; the baby he was going to be born as therefore can't be born), with Gentle Repose there is no baby the soul was sent to. This would have its own consequences, as the soul would be in limbo the whole time until the friend is resurrected. Instead of having the 'I went towards the bright light and then came back' experience, you might have the more terrifying 'there was nothing I could feel it THERE WAS NOTHINNNNG' experience to roleplay. Yes. Roleplaying will be enforced. BELIEVE those characters, baby.

I'm of course exaggerating the seriousness and creepiness of the scenario, and in my experience, resurrection doesn't have to come up that often. But I think the deterrents to resurrection should totally be the creep factor, and not the cost. Cost is lame. When a party is arguing about whether Jerk the Wizard is really worth the five thousand gold it'd cost to revive him, I want it to be because Jerk the Wizard was a total jerk, and not because five thousand gold is a lot of money.

As for out of character discussions about it occurring at the table, I want those to be tinged by the player's own feelings on having to roleplay coming back from the dead. If the rules are "you can't just ignore it if your other friends take too long or do this; that is a part of your character now" then the option is always there, for players who don't enjoy being melodramatic (and for shame, why are you even playing an RPG? Honestly!), to just make a new character and say 'whoa guys, no thanks. Do not resurrect me, playing a resurrected character would just be toooooo spooky!'

As for games I'm planning to run, there is STEAMPUNK LONDON coming up. I'll have to sound out my players and make sure they're still potentially available. Here's hopin'.

And back to serious towne, the bill for my first car payment arrived today. It's not due for a month, but I have the unpleasant feeling that the financing company may not be willing to accept online payments, which bites. I do not remember to buy stamps, ever.
Page generated Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025 05:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios